Table of Contents
I would certainly include Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is somewhere in the top 3 but with those domestics you certainly have my leading 4 of all time for reliability. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine issue. Rust is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply appeared like a diesel.
I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time leaving it's very own method ... the 300i6 would do everything I require this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the automobile globe refuse to damage.
those should be held as the benchmark to which whatever else is gauged. Almost whatever else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 of course) Wow, because of the outpour of praise, it looked great so I got it, here's the advertisement lmk what you people believe Oops, didn't mean to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz though, I'm relatively large, and the guiding wheel to seat is relatively narrow ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only problem I have actually ever before seen with trucks like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little also hard and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage will not be the finest in the world, but it will certainly damn sure run forever. Never ever had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply appeared like a diesel. I question just how hard a swap it would be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time obtaining out of it's own way ... The engine bay wasn't designed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One Container eliminate an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, but it sucks.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill composed: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he state to warrant this? I'm really interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly require this action. "They are usually dependable as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled created: wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I question exactly how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Extremely very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not explain ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor since when I had to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that wasn't sludged up actually severely.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're mosting likely to speak about a few concerns of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is much better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are several of the differences in between these two brands? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same car.
Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. Let's talk concerning engine and really just to specify that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I mean, these vans have been around for a lengthy time.
And, you recognize, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you recognize, around that time too. We're not going to obtain back right into, right into the earlier things. Considering that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more preferred and I would not actually suggest a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with strike to these engines, because they really did not have enough threading in the spark plug, which created troubles.
Very very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I really did not explain ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I needed to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that wasn't sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to talk regarding a few problems of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same car.
They seem to be a little more utilized because location, yet, you understand, those are several of the usages, however they're essentially the same group of car. Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. What issues do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's speak about engine and really just to define that the model years, we're mosting likely to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a long period of time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you understand, around that time as well. So we're not going to get back into, right into the earlier stuff. Considering that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I wouldn't really suggest a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have enough threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer near me Garland
Ford F150 dealership around Garland, Texas
The smart Trick of Plumbing That Nobody is Talking About